Bird Navigation III

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

     Birds of various species, from pigeons to swallows to larger birds, can navigate long distances on Earth, across continents and hemispheres. That they can traverse these distances thanks to a magnetic sense has been demonstrated through tests in which birds fitted with magnets have lost their navigational capability. Precisely what biological mechanism enables birds to orient in this way is still something of a mystery, however, with two theories prevailing.
     One theory is that birds possess magnetic sensors in the form of grains of magnetite, which is an easily magnetized form of iron oxide. Such magnetite grains are common not only in animals but even in bacteria, where they have been established as a component enabling magnetic orientation. In the case of birds, magnetite grains are numerous in beaks, as dissections of pigeons have confirmed. Moreover, in another experiment, the trigeminal nerve, which connects the beak to the brain, was severed in reed warblers; the affected birds lost their sense of magnetic dip, which is critical to navigation.
     Critics of the theory have pointed out that the abundance of grains in the beak are not concentrated, as would be expected in a sensory organ, but rather found in wandering macrophages. And while an alternative explanation for birds' sensory abilities might posit magnetite grains outside of the beak, such an explanation would be supported neither by the beak dissections nor by the tests of severed trigeminals. Critics of magnetite-centric theories suggest a second theory: that the magnetic field of the Earth has an influence on a chemical reaction in birds, specifically in a bird's retina. Experiments have demonstrated that destroying the portion of a robin's retina known as cluster N eliminates the bird's ability to detect north. Birds' eyes do not contain magnetite grains, however. Rather, some advocates of the theory that birds navigate by retinal interaction believe that a retinal protein known as cryptochrome processes magnetic information within the cluster N. Surprisingly, the mechanism by which cryptochrome could detect magnetic orientation depends on quantum mechanics: when hit by light, the cryptochrome would create a pair of particles, one of which subsequently presents information to the eye, in the form of a spot, when it is triggered a corresponding particle after that particle has traveled some distance.

Which of the following would be most useful to know in order to evaluate the retinal theory of navigation?

Review: Bird Navigation III


Explanation

We are asked for something "useful to know" in evaluating the second theory. The most useful thing to know will always be something that is critical to know, if there is such a thing, so we can always start with that. We can evaluate each answer choice with that question: is this critical to whether or not theory 2 is correct? (A) mixes magnetite grains and retinas, details from theory 1 and theory 2, in a jumble. So (A) is out. (B) may be critical, or at least relevant. (C) is not critical to whether the theory is correct; it may impact whether the theory is understood, but the passage concerns only whether the theory is correct. So (C) is out. (D) has promise. (E) is another jumble, because wandering macrophages are not relevant to theory 2, only theory 1. We are down to (B) and (D). Which is more critical? It's not critical that other birds have retinas that are identical to those of robins, only whether they are identical in the relevant aspect. Their retinas could be of a different color, or larger, but so what? And that leads us back to the cryptochrome. The passage says that "scientists believe" that cryptochrome processes magnetic information. If that's not true, the theory will fall apart. If it is known to be true, then the theory is a little stronger.

The correct answer is (D).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.