Unpasteurized Milk

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

Pasteurization greatly reduces the number of potentially disease-causing microbes in milk. However, it destroys enzymes that contribute to immunity and also digestive enzymes, such as lactase, that aid the body in assimilating milk's nutrients. Some parties, pointing out that for some milk drinkers, such as infants, the benefits of drinking unpasteurized milk are outweighed by the risks, conclude too hastily that unpasteurized milk is too dangerous, overlooking the fact that _______________.

Review: Unpasteurized Milk


Explanation

Reading the question: we will logically complete the argument, knowing that clues in the prompt will render one choice objectively more logical than the others. Given a blank, we will always guess what goes in that blank before looking at the choices. The prompt switches points of view midway. Where we end up is that the thing in the blank needs to be a reason that UNpasteurized is milk is NOT too dangerous--even though it's too dangerous for babies. So it's going to be something like, "it's perfectly safe for most people, just keep it away from the babies." That's our filter.

Applying the filter: the closest answer choice is (C). Other answer choices are pro-unpasteurized milk, namely (A). But (C) is better than (A) because it specifically draws the distinction that has been set up about babies. As we were predicting, "just keep it away from the babies." (C) expresses that logical continuation with the phrase "for other drinkers of milk." The correct answer is (C).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.