False Science

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

Astrology is considered by many a false science, but it is in fact a true field of science, because it uses scientific methods, such as the analysis of cause and effect and careful documentation of observations over time by many individuals.

The conclusion above is properly drawn if which of the following is assumed?

Review: False Science


Explanation

Reading the question: this is a brief, pseudo-syllogistic argument, so we will use term matching.



The conclusion comes at the beginning of this argument; "Astrology is a true field of science" is the opinion that draws on the other facts for support. The improperly matched term is "true field of science." The most critical assumption is roughly, "A field that uses scientific methods is a true field of science." That statement or a variant of it, such as its contrapositive, is what we're expecting as the answer.

Applying the filter: (C) and (D) both have the right terms involved. Choice (D) matches our prediction. Choice (C) is the logical inversion of what we're looking for, so it is not correct.

Logical proof: We can prove choice (D) with the negation test. Say that employing scientific methods did not make that field of study is true field of science. In that case, the argument falls apart. Since the negation of (D) destroys the argument, (D) itself is assumed by the argument. The correct answer is (D).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.