Small Robots

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

Nanotechnology may pose risks in the coming decades as we find it increasingly commonplace to introduce small robots into our bodies. But the fact that these robots might be invisible to the naked eye doesn't mean we are helpless against them. After all, since the initial development of germ theory, we have designed and continuously improved upon ways to protect ourselves from a variety of germs.

In the passage, the author develops the argument by

Review: Small Robots


Explanation

Reading the question: the stem of this question is unusual, since it asks how "the author develops the argument." It's worth a glance at the answer choices to determine their format. The answer choices are somewhat generalized descriptions of how the author has formed his argument. We can create a filter by starting with the opinion in the prompt.

Creating a filter: The conclusion of the argument doesn't really appear until the second sentence, with the opinion, "doesn't mean we are helpless against them." The "development" of the argument is simply the final sentence. This is a comparison with germ theory. We'd call it either a comparison or an example and will look for "comparison or example" in the answer choices.

Applying the filter: Looking at the first couple words of each answer choice, we're left with (C). Indeed, an analogy is a comparison. The "known" phenomenon is germ theory and the "unknown" phenomenon is nanotech. We confirm that the author is not doing the other things. The correct answer is (C).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.