Explanation
Reading the question: since we have a logical continuation
question, we will insist on predicting what goes in the blank, at least
approximately, before turning to the answer choices.
Creating a filter: the cuis are
endangered; half have vanished in the last two years, but the other half won't
quite vanish in the next two year, because...something. Maybe the situation has
slightly improved. We'll call our prediction "slightly improved situation" and
turn to the answer choices.
Applying the filter: choices (B) and (E) both give us
slightly improved situations. At first they seem equally good. Then we notice
(B) uses the phrase "as had been considered." So (B) isn't an improved
situation; it's a not-worsening situation. (E) is a better
logical continuation, because the maned wolf has
declined faster than predicted. None of the other answer choices involve an
amendment to the prediction to explain why the cuis
will hang on a little longer than expected. The correct answer is (E).
If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.