Discount Hardship

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

In harsh economic times, there is a shift in business from mainstream retail stores to discount retail stores as consumers aim to reduce their total monthly spending. For local discount stores, when unemployment rises or effective wages decline due to inflation or another cause, sales go up. By contrast, however, during periods of extreme economic hardship, business at discount stores stops improving and may even suffer.

Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the contrast described above?

Review: Discount Hardship


Explanation

Reading the question: we notice that this is an "explain" question. There's not an argument here, but rather two facts separating by the phrase "by contrast." we try to sum up the contrast. It's that discount retail: 1) can do well in times of hardship, but 2) can also suffer in times of hardship. An explanation will contradict nothing so far and it will connect to both points, the dual success/failure.

Applying the filter: Choice (A) doesn't address the dual success/failure aspect. Nor does (B). Choice (C) sounds promising; when discount stores are doing well, the costs of wages goes up; could that be enough to push their business down? But we look back at the prompt, and it says in the second part that "business at discount stores stops improving and may even suffer." It seems to be talking about the revenue side, not the cost side, especially given what precedes, and (C) doesn't explain that. Choice (D) works: consumers spend more at discount stores under some hardship, but less under severe hardship. Choice (E) discusses only one side of the contrast. The correct answer is (D).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.