Panel Subterfuge

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

Unlike the belief of the non-academics involved that the panel proceedings are subterfuge for discrimination, the academic peers of the professor under review are better equipped to evaluate the contributions and performance of their colleague in the review of potential termination due to neglect of duty.

Review: Panel Subterfuge


Explanation

Creating a filter: once we get going with this prompt we see the word "unlike," so we know there's a comparison. That means that we want to confirm that the grammatical expression of comparison matches the intended meaning. It does not: stripping out the prepositional phrase starting with "of the non-academics," we see that "belief" is being compared with "peers." Since "belief" is the only of the two words in the underlined portion, that's the part that will have to change, so that we are comparing people with people. We go to the answer choices looking for this outcome.

Applying the filter: the other answer choices solve the comparison problem in (A), but they introduce other problems. In (B), "of the belief" and "proceedings being" are both questionable style. Choices (C) and (E) both have the same problem: "non-academics involved believing" is poor style -- we won't give the academics an -ing verb if we can give them a pure and simple verb. That's what (D) does. The correct answer is (D).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.