M. Norton Wise III

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

     M. Norton Wise's examination of the calorimeter, a machine invented in the 1780s to measure heat, elucidates his theory of a role that technology plays in society outside of the applications for which it has been developed.
     In the schema given to us by Thomas Kuhn, as popularly understood, cultural differences are mediated through the paradigms that underlie theories--the theories' interconnected assumptions. According to Wise's theory, however, technologies act as cultural mediators, reconciling differences among different fields of thought and study, such as chemistry, political economy, and mathematics, and also connecting ideas with realities. When Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier and Pierre-Simon de Laplace first invented the calorimeter, they thought of it in comparison to a simple physical device, the balance scale: the calorimeter balanced quantities of heat against quantities of melted ice. In fact, Lavoisier and Laplace conceived of the device somewhat differently, and in this respect the calorimeter performed mediation of the first kind. Lavoisier, who is remembered as a chemist, viewed the calorimeter as measuring a balance between chemical substances, whereas Laplace, who is remembered as a mathematician and physical astronomer, viewed the calorimeter as balancing forces.
     The differing interests of Lavoisier and Laplace (who tried at least once to rid himself of the partnership in order to work on pure mathematics) caused tension. This tension between the otherwise distinct fields of chemistry and physical astronomy was resolved, in part, by the calorimeter itself; it provided a common ground to the two fields in its own concrete existence and quantitative measure, if not entirely in concept. Secondly, the calorimeter, in providing commonly accepted measurements, gave commonly accepted meanings to the ideas involved in interpreting those measurements: caloric fluid and the physical force of heat.
     We are typically more inclined to view a new technological invention in the terms of Kuhn--it supports an existing paradigm, or, rarely, massively disrupts it and causes a paradigm shift. Wise would agree with Kuhn that our conception of the electron is reinforced by the television and the fiberoptic cable, but while Kuhn sees the theoretical relationship as one of champion against challenger, arbitrated through defeat and continued reigning victory, technologies per Wise arbitrate by harmonizing.

Which of the following most likely expresses Wise's opinion of Kuhn's theory?

Review: M. Norton Wise III


Explanation

This question seemingly asks us to put words in Wise's mouth, only we will not have to do that, because we will attribute a view to Wise based exactly on what the passage has told us. As we summarized earlier, Kuhn describes revolution, while Wise describes mediation. So Wise's criticism of Kuhn theory would be that it describes some things as revolutions that are better described as mediation. Simple enough. Let's see where that appears in the answer choices. Both (B) and (D) are in the ballpark of this prediction. Choice (B) is accurate, because Kuhn's theory expressions that a technology "invariably supports or challenges," while in Wise's theory the technology can mediate differences. Choice (D) is partly nonsensical, because "paradigm shifts" are an idea in Kuhn's theory and not in Wise's; Wise hasn't done any explaining of paradigm shifts and, since the paradigm shift is a concept that expresses Kuhn's inherently not-mediating idea, it can't be explained in terms of mediation. So (D) is out. So we have (B) as our answer, but to review the other choices: (A) is inconsistent, because Wise also uses metaphor. In choice (C), what the "wider significance" is is exactly the point on which Kuhn and Wise differ. Choice (E) is unsupported, as there is no discussion of the impact on the minds of scientists; for example, we don't know whether the calorimeter helped the two scientists personally understand each other better.

The correct answer is (B).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.