Explanation
This question hits on a now-familiar point: can we apply
the author's interpretation of Klein's theory? The keys to applying expert
intuition, according to the author, are situational regularity and individual
memory, which includes sufficient individual experience. Both the stock picker
and the chess player are "dedicated," implying they both have experience and
hence memory. But they are unequal, so there must be a difference in the
situational regularity. The point is that chess is a game with fixed rules and
hence some situational regularity, while the stock market is less regular, and
hence less suitable for the application of expert intuition. Let's look in the
answer choices for this explanation. Choice (D) captures it, and nothing else
is close.
The correct answer is (D).
If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.