Explanation
Suppose we skim the answer choices and we're at a loss.
We'll do another pass, looking for an objective error in each one. Choice (A)
has multiple flaws. We aren't told that the people using the CCI for stock
decisions are experts. Moreover, the author doesn't say that the CCI is flawed,
just that it does something else. So (A) is out. Choice (B) is in line with the
author's main point. The author does grant that there might be some bearing on
some individual stocks, but (B) accommodates for that with "little to no
information." So we can keep (B) for now. Choice (C) is flawed in saying that
"individuals consider it a leading indicator," because the author says "the CCI
is generally agreed to be a lagging indicator." The investors who are using the
CCI are apparently using it despite knowing that it's a lagging indicator. So
(C) is out. In Choice (D), "confidence of individuals in the market" is exactly
what the CCI is designed to measure, and the author hasn't attacked that
function of the CCI, so (D) is out. Choice (E) is out because it's not the
CCI's objective to inform stock decisions.
The correct answer is (B).
If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.