Explanation
In this question, as in every question that involves a
statement "inferred from" or "supported by" a passage or prompt, we should
first look for something that is required.
If one of these statements is required by the passage, then it's certainly
well supported. This slightly non-obvious relationship is not really a testmaker trick; rather, it is a byproduct of the testmaker's efforts to write questions in which one answer
choice is objectively better than the others.
Digging in, we look for a statement that must be true or
which is assumed by the passage. Choice (A) may be the most confusing, so we
can come back to it. Choice (B) involves physical similarities, choice (C)
involves fossils and choice (D) involves physical similarities. What is the key
point in this passage about fossils and physical similarities? It's that
fossils are hard to obtain, so scientists used physical similarities in their
studies. That's how the c-fish and the lungfish become fishes of interest. So
the passage must believe (B); it's grounds for the line of reasoning. (C) and
(D) are somewhat opposite; if the author believed them, they would pose a
threat to the passage, so the passage does not support them.
At this point, we could go fairly confidently with (B) or
we could confirm objective flaws with choices (A) and (E). Choice (A) is not
supported by the passage. The passage admits a degree of uncertainty about who
is the closest relative, but it ends up decisive that the lungfish, not the
c-fish, is the closest relative of the land animals; this implies that a path has been identified as correct, contrary
to (A). So (A) is out. (E), meanwhile, is a jumble of fragments from the
passage. The c-fish and the lungfish became species of interest because of
their morphology, their skeletons, not specifically because their DNA hadn't
changed.
The correct answer is (B).
If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.