Innovation IV

Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.

     It has estimated that over 20% of the annual gross domestic product in the United States is the result of innovation backed at some point by venture capital investors. But what is innovation? One traditional view of innovation is that it is a systematic business process occurring within an organization required to secure ongoing financial growth. But much of the most acclaimed and influential innovation has started with an individual's idea and only somewhat later followed with an organization to execute on that idea, so the organizational definition is of limited relevance.
     A more practical definition of innovation is that it is the creation of anything new intended to be commercialized. Under such a definition, the efforts of a lone individual developing a radical idea and those of a department within a large company to explore a new adjacent market are both examples of innovation. This somewhat loose definition, however, fails to address explicitly what makes an innovation truly new, successful, or authentic, although it may imply that all innovation is equally valid in a sense. Otherwise, the oft-repeated challenge to uses of the term innovation may put too little emphasis on the activity and too much on its results. Quite possibly, 80% of the value of innovation has been contributed by 20% of the activity, but whether that 20% of activity could have manifested itself without a culture and economy to support the whole is less clear. In this regard, policy- and strategy-oriented attempts to refine this loose definition of innovation further are without merit.

The author of the passage mentions which of the following as one disadvantage of the "more practical" definition of innovation, as mentioned in the highlighted text?

Review: Innovation IV


Explanation 

This question asks for a detail, but it's a more salient detail that should be fairly fresh in our minds, because it pertains to one of the author's opinions: the more practical definition is better than the traditional one, but it doesn't help us decide whether an innovation is "new, successful, or authentic." We can look for that criticism in the answer choices. (A) is not what we expected but is not offensive. (B) is false; the definition is broader than the traditional one. (C) is plausible, but not stated in the passage. (D) is quite similar to our expectation about "new, successful, or authentic." (E) might be true, but it's been advanced as an advantage rather than a disadvantage, to the extent that it's either. So we are down to (A) and (D). One will have an objective defect. Is there an error with (A)? The author says that we cannot "refine" the practical definition for use in policy and strategy, but he never says that the unrefined definition can't serve as a basis at all. It's quite possible the author thinks the definition is useful, just not refineable. (A) is out.

The correct answer is (D).


If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.