Decline in Pickpockets Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.Columnist: The chief of police has claimed in a recent press conference that the decline in the number of pickpockets caught on the street indicates that his department that has partly eliminated this petty crime. He might as well argue that because there are higher levels of fog over L.A., there are fewer stars in the night sky. The gentlemen of our police department, in all likelihood, have caught fewer acts of petty crime lately simply because their vigilance is haphazard, at best. The columnist's statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion? Catching acts of petty crime requires vigilance above all. It is possible to estimate roughly how many petty crimes are committed in the area through methods of inference. Crimes unobserved due to negligence and stars unobserved due to fog stand in roughly equal proportion over time. Rather than believe the chief of police, the people of the town should demand greater vigilance of the police force. Pickpockets continue to carry on their petty crimes. Review Answer