Right to Search Welcome! You are encouraged to register with the site and login (for free). When you register, you support the site and your question history is saved.While our nation's law enforcement can search our bodily persons in public if they have just cause, they can search our homes only if they have a signed warrant. Therefore, our nation's law enforcement should be able to search our electronic communications only if they have a signed warrant. The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if which of the following were inserted into the argument as an additional premise? Our electronic communications are at least as private as our homes. A search of a bodily person in public is more likely to discover something worthwhile to law enforcement than a search of electronic communications. Hasty search of electronic communications, like that of homes, violates basic human rights. In the experience of our nation's law enforcement, electronic communications are even more trustworthy sources of information than homes. In terms of the criteria used to justify a search by law enforcement, electronic communications are more nearly comparable to homes than to bodily persons. Review Answer