Explanation
Reading comprehension: our ears should prick up at the
phrase "play no part." We can see by altering or omitting this phrase that
represents a critical detail in the argument. Text passwords may be inferior in
some ways, but that doesn't mean it won't help to use them in addition to some
other measures; the argument fails to recognize that. We have a critical detail
filter to apply to the answer choices, something like, "maybe the argument is
wrong because it's worth using text passwords along with other measures."
Applying the filter: We compare the answer choices with
our expectation. Choice (A) is immaterial, because the argument isn't
discussing "noncritical" systems. Choice (B) contradicts the evidence we have
been given, the argument does give an alternative to text passwords--it
mentions biometrics. Choice (C) is irrelevant. Choice (D) delivers on our
expectation: it says, in other words, text passwords can "play a part." Choice
(E) is irrelevant, because the argument and its conclusion are about average
text-format passwords only, not stronger ones.
Logical proof: We can't apply the negation test exactly to
an answer choice, given the way they are wording. But we can negate the idea
being conveyed by imagining that the argument did consider using both methods. We can confirm that such an
argument would be stronger; it would have better grounds to say that text
passwords can "play no part." We have confirmed that we are discussing a point
of failure in the argument. The correct answer is (D).
If you believe you have found an error in this question or explanation, please contact us and include the question title or URL in your message.